<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>#attribution · Louche Cannon</title>
    <link>https://gbilder.com/tags/attribution/</link>
    <description>#attribution from Louche Cannon</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:46:39 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gbilder.com/tags/attribution/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>I finally feel grateful for ChatGPT’s help, and it’s weird - Fast Company</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS93EPVCC5QMTCN3HJM02/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS93EPVCC5QMTCN3HJM02/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:46:39 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>ml-ethics</category>
      <category>attribution</category>
      <category>agency</category>
      <category>ml</category>
      <category>nb</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.fastcompany.com/91158989/chatgpt-ai-appreciation-day&#34;&gt;https://www.fastcompany.com/91158989/chatgpt-ai-appreciation-day&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;e-content&#34;&gt;&lt;p&gt;wanting to thank ChatGPT for its simulated expertise feels like being grateful to the author of a CliffsNotes summary of Hamlet on the grounds that it’s a great story—without even knowing who Shakespeare was. Except in the case of AI, the summary draws on text written by millions of anonymous people. I’m sorry I don’t know who they are, because I benefit from their work every time I pop open a ChatGPT window.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
