<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>#nonsense · Louche Cannon</title>
    <link>https://gbilder.com/tags/nonsense/</link>
    <description>#nonsense from Louche Cannon</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:08:41 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gbilder.com/tags/nonsense/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Finally: a usable and secure password policy backed by science</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHRS8FNVJRSSV6Y08MYX38/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHRS8FNVJRSSV6Y08MYX38/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:08:41 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>passwords</category>
      <category>security</category>
      <category>nonsense</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.cylab.cmu.edu/news/2020/10/20-passwordpolicy.html&#34;&gt;https://www.cylab.cmu.edu/news/2020/10/20-passwordpolicy.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;e-content&#34;&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is dangerous nonsense. Lots of people are going to conclude from this that they don&amp;#x27;t have to use complex password, avoiding dictionary words and symbols. But despite the headline- this is *not* the fundamental conclusion drawn in the paper. The subtlety is in the fact that they keep saying &amp;quot;user-generated and memorable&amp;quot;. The headline might as well read &amp;quot;humans are terrible at judging whether something they create is complex and random&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
