<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>#peer-review · Louche Cannon</title>
    <link>https://gbilder.com/tags/peer-review/</link>
    <description>#peer-review from Louche Cannon</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:44:08 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gbilder.com/tags/peer-review/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Will Paying Reviewers Ease the Peer Review Crisis?</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN1HHVHCHEG8SVWJME8X/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN1HHVHCHEG8SVWJME8X/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:44:08 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <category>incunabula</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty/books-publishing/2026/05/14/will-paying-reviewers-ease-peer-review-crisis&#34;&gt;https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty/books-publishing/2026/05/14/will-paying-reviewers-ease-peer-review-crisis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2026 AI Reviewing Experimet</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN1FXKSWY1RVBY077BCJ/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN1FXKSWY1RVBY077BCJ/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:43:38 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <category>incunabula</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2026/ai-reviewing-experiment&#34;&gt;https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2026/ai-reviewing-experiment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Peer review is overwhelmed—can it survive in the AI era? - Ars Technica</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN1D483RPDNF4791PNEJ/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN1D483RPDNF4791PNEJ/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 07:43:08 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>ml</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <category>incunabula</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/08/peer-review-is-overwhelmed-can-it-survive-in-the-ai-era/&#34;&gt;https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/08/peer-review-is-overwhelmed-can-it-survive-in-the-ai-era/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What will be left for us to work on? - by Arvind Narayanan</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSMHBAA3TDD4BCD95ZNGR/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSMHBAA3TDD4BCD95ZNGR/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 08:41:46 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>ml-analysis</category>
      <category>mitp</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <category>nb</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.normaltech.ai/p/what-will-be-left-for-us-to-work&#34;&gt;https://www.normaltech.ai/p/what-will-be-left-for-us-to-work&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;e-content&#34;&gt;&lt;p&gt;What benchmarks give us is efficiency. We don’t have to spend years peer-reviewing papers — if it beats the state of the art, we know it’s probably a good paper. But unfortunately, it has narrowed the collective vision of the community. We’re searching under streetlights — we are searching the kinds of things that are easy to search in a benchmark-driven evaluation regime. We need to move beyond that. That means evaluating how good a paper is will become much more costly. Sadly, that is a cost that we will have to pay. Right now the community is trying to rush in the opposite direction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why paying peer reviewers works, according to a journal’s editor-in-chief</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSMEAZQ8WMWR00QBBQPXQ/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSMEAZQ8WMWR00QBBQPXQ/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:52:35 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>mitp</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01973-z&#34;&gt;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01973-z&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More than half of researchers now use AI for peer review — often against guidance</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSJ1F1T6DYQMAKPWJX30W/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSJ1F1T6DYQMAKPWJX30W/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:22:27 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>ml</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-04066-5&#34;&gt;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-04066-5&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UKRI to scale up ‘radical’ change to peer review - Research Professional News</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSF7NJ1Y5HSHH4NWEN4K0/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSF7NJ1Y5HSHH4NWEN4K0/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 13:58:02 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-research-councils-2025-7-ukri-to-scale-up-radical-change-to-peer-review/&#34;&gt;https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-research-councils-2025-7-ukri-to-scale-up-radical-change-to-peer-review/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&#39;Positive review only&#39;: Researchers hide AI prompts in papers - Nikkei Asia</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSF54MQMFPH5358VWK3ZR/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSF54MQMFPH5358VWK3ZR/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 18:12:23 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Artificial-intelligence/Positive-review-only-Researchers-hide-AI-prompts-in-papers&#34;&gt;https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/Artificial-intelligence/Positive-review-only-Researchers-hide-AI-prompts-in-papers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Publishers Trial Paying Peer Reviewers - What Did They Find? - Slashdot</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSDMJ9RRN784T8ZD7WSME/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSDMJ9RRN784T8ZD7WSME/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:26:25 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://m.slashdot.org/story/440431&#34;&gt;https://m.slashdot.org/story/440431&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Home - MetaROR</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSC8JAGV3XYFA3B27M9J2/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSC8JAGV3XYFA3B27M9J2/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 18:44:41 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://cms.metaror.org/&#34;&gt;https://cms.metaror.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The early days of peer review: five insights from historic reports</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSAKPGG8DPCZRGCGNGXHG/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSAKPGG8DPCZRGCGNGXHG/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 22:45:01 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03287-4&#34;&gt;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03287-4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Peer review by committee? New journal rethinks old model</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSAA2F8MV9269QDZBJFZ8/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSAA2F8MV9269QDZBJFZ8/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:39:57 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03039-4&#34;&gt;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03039-4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suspicious phrases in peer reviews point to referees gaming the system | Science | AAAS</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS9ZQ66659GP38F94CRBP/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS9ZQ66659GP38F94CRBP/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:52:54 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>research-integrity</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.science.org/content/article/suspicious-phrases-peer-reviews-point-referees-gaming-system&#34;&gt;https://www.science.org/content/article/suspicious-phrases-peer-reviews-point-referees-gaming-system&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Peer review is essential for science. Unfortunately, it’s broken. | Ars Technica</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8V9C7MZYGNFSEGVCP0Z/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8V9C7MZYGNFSEGVCP0Z/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:34:24 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>trust</category>
      <category>research-fraud</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/peer-review-is-essential-for-science-unfortunately-its-broken/&#34;&gt;https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/peer-review-is-essential-for-science-unfortunately-its-broken/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Should We Critique Research?</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7R4QKMYJX3SCVYNTT17/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7R4QKMYJX3SCVYNTT17/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 18:15:36 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>statistics</category>
      <category>trust</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://gwern.net/research-criticism&#34;&gt;https://gwern.net/research-criticism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;e-content&#34;&gt;&lt;p&gt;what makes a criticism important is how much it could change a result if corrected and how much that would then change our decisions or actions: to what extent it is a “difference which makes a difference”.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Early COVID-19 research is riddled with poor methods and low-quality results − a problem for science the pandemic worsened but didn’t create</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS66ECSV9NYGXSB3YAR8C/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS66ECSV9NYGXSB3YAR8C/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:52:27 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <category>preprints</category>
      <category>trust</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://theconversation.com/early-covid-19-research-is-riddled-with-poor-methods-and-low-quality-results-a-problem-for-science-the-pandemic-worsened-but-didnt-create-220635&#34;&gt;https://theconversation.com/early-covid-19-research-is-riddled-with-poor-methods-and-low-quality-results-a-problem-for-science-the-pandemic-worsened-but-didnt-create-220635&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Crowd Sourced Review Probably Can’t Replace the Journals | The Road Goes On, Thoughts and Essays by Daniel Bingham</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS61S457FXCE1KPF7Q208/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS61S457FXCE1KPF7Q208/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:34:26 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>four-strawmen</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://theroadgoeson.com/crowdsourcing-peer-review-probably-wont-work&#34;&gt;https://theroadgoeson.com/crowdsourcing-peer-review-probably-wont-work&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;  &lt;div class=&#34;e-content&#34;&gt;&lt;p&gt;About time somebody made these points&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Peer review is an honor-based system – Daniel Lemire&#39;s blog</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS5NJ3W34XBRM8E6FFNA9/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS5NJ3W34XBRM8E6FFNA9/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2024 22:14:07 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://lemire.me/blog/2008/08/21/peer-review-is-an-honor-based-system/&#34;&gt;https://lemire.me/blog/2008/08/21/peer-review-is-an-honor-based-system/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianni</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS0NTBKH0GDD6YXPFP107/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS0NTBKH0GDD6YXPFP107/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:51:18 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <category>publishing</category>
      <category>trust</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review&#34;&gt;https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Providing transparency and building trust: the Peer Review Information Service for Monographs (PRISM)  – OAPEN – supporting the transition to open access for academic books</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHRZJAWRMG43VDAHXD6W6Y/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHRZJAWRMG43VDAHXD6W6Y/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 08:03:27 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>books</category>
      <category>peer-review</category>
      <category>metadata</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://oapen.hypotheses.org/315&#34;&gt;https://oapen.hypotheses.org/315&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
