<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>#retractions · Louche Cannon</title>
    <link>https://gbilder.com/tags/retractions/</link>
    <description>#retractions from Louche Cannon</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 09:35:36 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gbilder.com/tags/retractions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Defamation Suit Demanding Elsevier Retract Paper Heads Closer To Trial - Slashdot</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN7Q1G5GNZTW4PEXQYKT/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSN7Q1G5GNZTW4PEXQYKT/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 09:35:36 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/08/23/0113210/defamation-suit-demanding-elsevier-retract-paper-heads-closer-to-trial&#34;&gt;https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/08/23/0113210/defamation-suit-demanding-elsevier-retract-paper-heads-closer-to-trial&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck? - Ars Technica</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSMBKRN34FENS8RQ9JSB4/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSMBKRN34FENS8RQ9JSB4/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 13:55:22 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/why-did-this-journal-retract-two-1940s-papers-by-max-planck/&#34;&gt;https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/why-did-this-journal-retract-two-1940s-papers-by-max-planck/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>‘Comically bad’ datasets used to train clinical models for stroke and diabetes  – Retraction Watch</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSKXJ4V3BEWGN60B76305/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSKXJ4V3BEWGN60B76305/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 21:49:42 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <category>ml-accuracy</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://retractionwatch.com/2026/05/18/kaggle-dataset-clinical-models-stroke-diabetes/&#34;&gt;https://retractionwatch.com/2026/05/18/kaggle-dataset-clinical-models-stroke-diabetes/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&#39;Nature&#39; Retracts Paper on the Benefits of ChatGPT in Education</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSKRCYXNFWMPGRF0AMZTQ/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSKRCYXNFWMPGRF0AMZTQ/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 23:39:07 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <category>vraix</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.404media.co/nature-retracts-paper-on-the-benefits-of-chatgpt-in-education/&#34;&gt;https://www.404media.co/nature-retracts-paper-on-the-benefits-of-chatgpt-in-education/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSKQY16KVT9FQ9C573WVM/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSKQY16KVT9FQ9C573WVM/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 07:30:05 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04787-y&#34;&gt;https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04787-y&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Elsevier Shuts Down Its Finance Journal Citation Cartel</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSJWR4KY8G31WG13F682S/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSJWR4KY8G31WG13F682S/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 15:55:34 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>citation</category>
      <category>research-integrity-is-bullshit</category>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <category>vraix</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.chrisbrunet.com/p/elsevier-shuts-down-its-finance-journal&#34;&gt;https://www.chrisbrunet.com/p/elsevier-shuts-down-its-finance-journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Decades-old study on common weed killer retracted after journal editor says Monsanto may have helped write it | CBC News</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSHWHHVJN3K7D66664GKZ/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSHWHHVJN3K7D66664GKZ/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 18:59:06 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <category>vraix</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/glyphosate-retraction-9.7004363&#34;&gt;https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/glyphosate-retraction-9.7004363&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>India to penalize universities with too many retractions</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSFR20E0V2ZMXXCBMVP6W/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSFR20E0V2ZMXXCBMVP6W/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 00:26:20 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02364-6&#34;&gt;https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02364-6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Widely panned arsenic life paper gets retracted—15 years after brouhaha - Ars Technica</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSFMWYAMCBJACS2BY6XX3/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSFMWYAMCBJACS2BY6XX3/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:32:08 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/07/widely-panned-arsenic-life-paper-gets-retracted-15-years-after-brouhaha/&#34;&gt;https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/07/widely-panned-arsenic-life-paper-gets-retracted-15-years-after-brouhaha/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BREAKING NEWS: CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed.</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSCDNC9879RVHVDF4PSCP/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSCDNC9879RVHVDF4PSCP/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 08:21:22 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <category>fascism</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://insidemedicine.substack.com/p/breaking-news-cdc-orders-mass-retraction&#34;&gt;https://insidemedicine.substack.com/p/breaking-news-cdc-orders-mass-retraction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thousands of Highly Cited Scientists Have At Least One Retraction - Slashdot</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSCCTP0KWB54RNTD6Z2KS/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSCCTP0KWB54RNTD6Z2KS/</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 00:11:31 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://m.slashdot.org/story/438237&#34;&gt;https://m.slashdot.org/story/438237&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Science paper piracy site Sci-Hub shares lots of retracted papers - Ars Technica</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSBYE83G35VK6BY2262ZV/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHSBYE83G35VK6BY2262ZV/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 23:45:30 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/01/science-paper-piracy-site-sci-hub-shares-lots-of-retracted-papers/&#34;&gt;https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/01/science-paper-piracy-site-sci-hub-shares-lots-of-retracted-papers/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>‘We authors paid a heavy price’: Journal retracts all 23 articles in special issue – Retraction Watch</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8NJ91BCEERV0YB234J5/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8NJ91BCEERV0YB234J5/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 16:13:09 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://retractionwatch.com/2024/07/01/we-authors-paid-a-heavy-price-journal-retracts-all-23-articles-in-special-issue/&#34;&gt;https://retractionwatch.com/2024/07/01/we-authors-paid-a-heavy-price-journal-retracts-all-23-articles-in-special-issue/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Retract Now: Negating Flawed Research Must Be Quicker | MedPage Today</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8EXCRB21Q2VCB7GVRTT/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8EXCRB21Q2VCB7GVRTT/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:06:05 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/110698?trw=no&#34;&gt;https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/110698?trw=no&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How a widely used ranking system ended up with three fake journals in its top 10 philosophy list – Retraction Watch</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8AHXY2TZN8MEHJYNB4N/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS8AHXY2TZN8MEHJYNB4N/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:40:48 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://retractionwatch.com/2024/06/12/how-a-widely-used-ranking-system-ended-up-with-three-fake-journals-in-its-top-10-philosophy-list/&#34;&gt;https://retractionwatch.com/2024/06/12/how-a-widely-used-ranking-system-ended-up-with-three-fake-journals-in-its-top-10-philosophy-list/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Researchers plan to retract landmark Alzheimer’s paper containing doctored images | Science | AAAS</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS853VR2XZHBF7PXCCX9H/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS853VR2XZHBF7PXCCX9H/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 12:31:45 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>research-fraud</category>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.science.org/content/article/researchers-plan-retract-landmark-alzheimers-paper-containing-doctored-images&#34;&gt;https://www.science.org/content/article/researchers-plan-retract-landmark-alzheimers-paper-containing-doctored-images&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7X72M4QSF681QH7V88G/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7X72M4QSF681QH7V88G/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 22:00:03 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <category>research-fraud</category>
      <category>research-integrity</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/why-scientific-fraud-is-suddenly-everywhere.html&#34;&gt;https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/why-scientific-fraud-is-suddenly-everywhere.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Retraction Dashboard</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7QSA1YVY55EQCE288PJ/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7QSA1YVY55EQCE288PJ/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 16:59:12 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <category>dashboards</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://retraction-dashboard.netlify.app/&#34;&gt;https://retraction-dashboard.netlify.app/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nature earns ire over lack of code availability for Google DeepMind protein folding paper – Retraction Watch</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7P7R77756RKEKRN0RSE/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7P7R77756RKEKRN0RSE/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 11:06:39 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>reproducibility</category>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://retractionwatch.com/2024/05/14/nature-earns-ire-over-lack-of-code-availability-for-google-deepmind-protein-folding-paper/&#34;&gt;https://retractionwatch.com/2024/05/14/nature-earns-ire-over-lack-of-code-availability-for-google-deepmind-protein-folding-paper/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A wave of retractions is shaking physics | MIT Technology Review</title>
      <link>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7MTAMYZ4NQCXTATHD2T/</link>
      <guid>https://gbilder.com/bookmarks/01M4EHS7MTAMYZ4NQCXTATHD2T/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 21:24:34 +0200</pubDate>
      <category>retractions</category>
      <description>&#xA;  &lt;p class=&#34;bafflegab-bookmark&#34;&gt;Bookmarked &lt;a class=&#34;u-bookmark-of&#34; href=&#34;https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/05/15/1092535/a-wave-of-retractions-is-shaking-physics/&#34;&gt;https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/05/15/1092535/a-wave-of-retractions-is-shaking-physics/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
