Notes

Think duplicate DOIs are a big problem? Think again. @d_tkaczyk has invented a new literary genre of “PID-Noir”: https://www.crossref.org/blog/double-trouble-with-dois/

@fake_journals @CrossrefOrg Spoiler- Nope. https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/

@franknorman @CrossrefOrg We agree. But note we do support “relationships”, an underused, under-promoted (& possibly inadequate) mechanism for capturing acknowledgement info. https://support.crossref.org/hc/en-us/articles/214357426-Relationships-between-DOIs-and-other-objects

Also- we are soliciting feedback on our schema:

https://www.crossref.org/blog/proposed-schema-changes-have-your-say/

Any product managers want to join us at @CrossrefOrg? We’re hiring: https://www.crossref.org/jobs/

@dpsSpiders Nice. Am sure @d_tkaczyk and rest of @CrossrefOrg will be interested in your feedback.