Notes

@CrossrefOrg Labs is doing cool work to improve our citation matching See @d_tkaczyk’s first post in a series here: https://www.crossref.org/blog/what-does-the-sample-say/

@zuphilip @CrossrefOrg @opencitations Yes, we strip the DOI from the generated reference string before trying to match again. Otherwise it would be too easy ;-).

@csarven @CrossrefOrg @ORCID_Org So ORCID public works approach would be easiest *today*. We are still exploring how to let individuals to make assertions via event data directly. Issue, as usual, is how to deal with spam, abuse, etc.

@csarven @CrossrefOrg @ORCID_Org Data included in Event Data is not from our members (we don’t have concept of “partners”). And no fees required for REST API or Event Data API.

@csarven @CrossrefOrg @ORCID_Org Not a question of conflict, but of documenting provenance. And system would support making new assertion about elements already deposited by pub, you could submit corrections, etc.