Notes

@arfon @_inundata @jenniferlin15 What’s more- @CrossrefOrg seem to only have *one* DOI with an emoji in the title or abstract. We really are a conservative industry. https://api.crossref.org/works/10.7146/pas.v29i72.19771

@_inundata @jenniferlin15 Nope. DOI standard does, but we only support limited subset of chars. Limitation originally designed to avoid url-breaking things like ?#, etc.

Hey fellow metadata-dweebs- cool PT position with group working to improve current scholarly infrastructure: http://www.metadata2020.org/blog/2018-10-19-community-lead-job/

@rmounce @internetarchive @CrossrefOrg We dream of it too and are working towards that. The architecture underlying CED puts a big piece of necessary infrastructure in place.

@valexiev1 @opencitations @CrossrefOrg @figshare @i4oc_org Hi.

1. To see records that have affiliations:

http://api.crossref.org/works?filter=has-affiliation:true

2. Those ids are not meant to resolve. They are “blank nodes.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank_node