In reply to
@jeroenbosman @jeroenson Hi. It doesn’t get huge amounts of attention. In general, we’d prefer that members just start with short, opaque DOIs as per @mfenner here https://blog.datacite.org/cool-dois/
In reply to
@jeroenbosman @jeroenson Hi. It doesn’t get huge amounts of attention. In general, we’d prefer that members just start with short, opaque DOIs as per @mfenner here https://blog.datacite.org/cool-dois/
In reply to
@gluejar @lisalibrarian I’ll let Eric take it from here. I need to get some protective glasses.
In reply to
@rmounce @chartgerink @cane51000 @Metadata2020 @CrossrefOrg @GinnyLDN No internal arguments. Reason for delay is much more prosaic… not enough devs (soon to be remedied) and so have been working with contractors.
In reply to
@cane51000 @chartgerink @rmounce @Metadata2020 @CrossrefOrg @GinnyLDN Simply that they have not deposited license information.
In reply to
@chartgerink @rmounce @cane51000 @Metadata2020 @CrossrefOrg @GinnyLDN We are working on an updated version of this labs project: http://browse.crossref.org/members/98
But also, cool- the reason we expose info in API is to encourage others to build tools too.