In reply to
@invisiblecomma @blahah404 Yes, can only encourage more pubs to release references. Easy to do in deposit: http://www.crossref.org/help/schema_doc/4.3.4/4_3_4.html#metadata_distribution_opts.att
In reply to
@invisiblecomma @blahah404 Yes, can only encourage more pubs to release references. Easy to do in deposit: http://www.crossref.org/help/schema_doc/4.3.4/4_3_4.html#metadata_distribution_opts.att
In reply to
@blahah404 @MikeTaylor @invisiblecomma @mrgunn @opencitations @bengoldacre As far as I know, Shotton is reviving it.
In reply to
@blahah404 @MikeTaylor @invisiblecomma @mrgunn But yes, XML is canonical :-( We are catching-up exposing all in JSON.
In reply to
@blahah404 @MikeTaylor @invisiblecomma @mrgunn More people than use the RDF ;-)
In reply to
@MikeTaylor @blahah404 @invisiblecomma @mrgunn Refs not exposed in JSON yet, but are in XML. For example: http://api.crossref.org/works/10.7554/eLife.10288/transform/application/vnd.crossref.unixsd+xml