In reply to
@aaccomazzi It is an alternative to STQ. STQ more conservative about matches.
In reply to
@aaccomazzi It is an alternative to STQ. STQ more conservative about matches.
@tedlawless already doing very cool work with #CrossRef Metadata Search API -> http://goo.gl/6EFJ9
We don't need no stinkin' parser- a guide to resolving free-form citations with #CrossRef Metadata Search -> http://goo.gl/f9a4e
In reply to
@herrison @hbunke @researchremix To be precise, under the MIT license.
In reply to
@ostephens @acka47 @brinxmat RDF was available at launch of CN. The *last* we added- the CSL representations- are the most popular.