#xitter

@valexiev1 @opencitations @CrossrefOrg @figshare @i4oc_org As I recall, these are meant to be blank nodes. Done back in 2011 in the absence of any reusable and disambiguated researcher identifier to map to.

@valexiev1 @opencitations @CrossrefOrg @figshare @i4oc_org Try using content negotiation on the DOI as per: https://crosscite.org/docs.html

Or direct API:

http://api.crossref.org/works/10.1186/1756-8722-5-3

@g3om4c Agreed- a big ask. We are looking at tools to make it easier. And another approach might be to encourage third parties to assert the linkages via Event Data: https://www.crossref.org/services/event-data/

@g3om4c setting aside other issues with FRBR … a) CrossRef/DataCite DOIs used for citation, so at the expression level, not manifestation level. b) We are encouraging linking of expressions using relationships in our schema.

@cshperspectives Member decides- but we *cough* can help member make a reasonable decision.